23-0 Answer to New Matter

23-0 Answer to New Matter

July 27th, 2021

 

PETITIONER’S REPLY TO NEW MATTER

 

Petitioner Ivy Hill Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby submits this Reply to New Matter, and in support thereof, avers as follows:

88. Denied. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no response is required; as such, they are denied. By way of further response, the Commonwealth Court has already expressly concluded this legal defense is without merit, see Memorandum Opinion (Pa. Cmwlth. June 17, 2021).

89. Denied. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no response is required; as such, they are denied. By way of further response, Exhibit A, being in writing, speaks for itself, and all characterizations thereof are denied.

90. Denied. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no response is required; as such, they are denied. By way of further response, the Commonwealth Court has already expressly concluded this legal defense is without merit, see Memorandum Opinion (Pa. Cmwlth. June 17, 2021).

91. Denied. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no response is required; as such, they are denied. By way of further response, the Commonwealth Court has already expressly concluded this legal defense is without merit, see Memorandum Opinion (Pa. Cmwlth. June 17, 2021).

92. Denied. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no response is required; as such, they are denied. By way of further response, the Commonwealth Court has already expressly concluded this legal defense is without merit, see Memorandum Opinion (Pa. Cmwlth. June 17, 2021).

93. Denied. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no response is required; as such, they are denied.

WHEREFORE, Petitioner Ivy Hill Congregation respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment in Petitioner’s favor.

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: July 27, 2021 /s/ Joshua J. Voss

 

File Type: pdf
Categories: Ivy Hill Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses versus Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, DHS
Tags: Ivy Hill Congregation of JWs Versus Pennsylvania
classic-editor-remember: classic-editor
JWCA Document Number: 23.0
Downloads: 1
justice gavel
Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.